🔗 Share this article

Following a significant regulatory appeal, the Australian classification review board has reversed a earlier ruling that blocked Australian-based users from seeing video footage of the violent event involving conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. The appeal was lodged by Elon Musk's company X, arguing against an directive issued at the request of the online safety regulator.

Details of the Original Classification Ruling

Following the death of Charlie Kirk at a US campus in last year, the eSafety commissioner applied to the classification board to assess and rate the circulating video. The board first determined the content was "refused classification", a rating that allowed the commissioner to instruct social media companies to restrict access to the posts for an Australian audience.

Elon Musk's company filed an appeal for two separate videos related to the Kirk incident. It also appealed a similar ruling on a separate video—depicting the assault of Iryna Zarutska on a North Carolina train—which had likewise been classified as "unacceptable for distribution".

Arguments Presented and Final Ruling

In its appeal, X asserted that the Kirk video contained only a short moment of violence with the weapon not shown. It was argued the recording was low-quality and the focus shifted rapidly from the individual to the bystanders.

X maintained the footage was not excessively detailed, gratuitous, or objectionable, adding that it served as a factual documentation of "a notorious public event of historical and political significance that prompted widespread discussion". X drew a parallel between the video and the historic film of President John F. Kennedy's assassination.

Most members of the review board concluded that, "notwithstanding the heinous nature of the event," the video did not reach a level that was gratuitous, exploitative or offensive enough to justify a complete ban. The board suggested that a more detailed depiction with different editing might have met that threshold. As a result, the panel changed the classification of the content to R18+.

The Minority Viewpoint

Some on the panel disagreed, arguing the post was "content designed for sharing for the probable aim of amusement and/or personal gain (such as engagement metrics)". This view stated the parallel with the JFK assassination tape was invalid, as the Kennedy video was made public long after the event, "after public sentiment around the matter had calmed".

Reactions to the Outcome

In a statement on its global government affairs account, X welcomed the ruling.

"We challenged this case to uphold free speech and the importance of public access about matters of public significance. We remain dedicated to protecting these fundamental values."

A spokesperson for the safety regulator acknowledged the board's decision, but noted that the revised classification now implies platforms "have obligations to ensure R18+ material is not accessible to Australians under 18".

Recent Developments on Violent Content

In related news, the eSafety commissioner has not issued take-down orders to platforms this week regarding disturbing videos from the Sydney beach incident shared across social media. Officials commented that while the images were distressing, they did not reach the required standard for a "refused classification" rating.

Instead, platforms have been instructed to use warning labels and screens, such as obscuring the image, on such content in line with their existing community guidelines.