🔗 Share this article

Last year, actor Jude Law stated he had no concerns about backlash for portraying the Russian leader in a new film. This production, though, may align so closely with the mythologized image circulated by official channels that, within Russia, it reads as a endorsement rather than a critique.

The Crafted Strongman

For years, the Kremlin and the country's entertainment industry have collaborated to craft a tailor-made version of the president. This character is an infallible strategist without age or mistakes, an ex-intelligence officer reframed as a Russian James Bond who consistently understands beyond what he shows.

“In Russia, the manufactured Putin has long eclipsed the real one.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

One recent example is a television show released last fall, helmed by a pro-government filmmaker. Its main character is a fictional blue-eyed lieutenant colonel inexplicably chosen to “rescue” the nation from disorder. While the character's name a different name, the implication is clear: the hero must be a familiar security officer.

International depictions often end up buttressing this identical story rather than debunking it. A new film inspired by a bestselling satirical novel sets out to undermine the Putin cult by framing him as a symptom but as a consequence, moving the focus to the political machinery around him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

On screen, Putin is shown as having been chosen by powerful oligarchs to steady the nation because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. They visit him and practically plead him to take the top job. His response is that he would rather govern from the shadows, seeking permanent power.

This narrative is the Kremlin’s export myth: the cool, reluctant strategist shaped by destiny. In reality, these events took place.

The Truth Behind the Selection

Nobody actually pleaded with Putin to accept the role. The position was in essence a selection process with many candidates. Central to the selection stood a powerful businessman from the previous administration who expected to run the state in practice.

• His list included several politicians, including an opposition leader later murdered and a security service director.
• According to a journalist who researched Putin’s biography, the future president merely met the required parameters: loyal, from the intelligence world, and politically neutral.
• A property developer familiar with the events said the primary requirement was manageability and loyalty, not strength.

“The goal wasn't a powerful leader, they needed someone controllable, someone who would obey orders.”

Building the 007 Persona

Analysts concur that the notion of Putin as a powerful KGB spy was constructed retrospectively. Stories about his clandestine activities in East Germany do not stand up to scrutiny. Fundamentally, he handled paperwork and routine duties, a low-level clerk not involved with field operations.

Interestingly, the move to framing him as a “spy” may in part have been triggered by the actor's debut as 007. His harder version led local outlets and online audiences to draw visual parallels with Putin. Mashup posters swapping the actor's likeness with Putin’s appeared on Moscow streets, feeding the increasing trend to see him as a local secret agent.

A Propaganda Win?

Given the casting, an actor well-liked by viewers there, the Kremlin are likely to seize the chance to frame his casting as a minor diplomatic triumph. The film's omission of mass protests, the opposition, or key figures from its narrative, even though it includes recent years, is a pleasant bonus for state propaganda.

Domestically, the president is often an omnipotent figure who remains unseen directly. He is signaled through photographs or orders from on high. Now, he at last gets a recognizable face—one that could unintentionally echo the very myths it perhaps aims to question.