🔗 Share this article

Just two days before the New York race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange issued a bold forecast – going beyond the winner overall, and precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections who grew up in New York City, has spent more than ten years in left-leaning activism and emerged as something of a local celebrity this year for his thorough analyses into city data and voter surveys.

He released his extremely precise forecast map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate was victorious although failed to predict the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his newsletter, his platform. He has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the split between the progressive stronghold, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (accurately) that Mamdani would triumph by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in audience and most voters favored Cuomo, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Surprises

How was your night?

I had to do that because they were dropping approximately 200K ballots into the system every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious initially: Mamdani was ahead the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but came large groups of votes that came in later and the advantage went from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world where yesterday turned out somewhat badly for him, in which Cuomo was going to end up essentially doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But Mamdani gained 500,000 votes to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his support from the first round.

Expanding Support

How did Mamdani gain those extra votes from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and individuals facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his core of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He created the coalition that the left long aimed for: multiracial, youthful, tenants and people squeezed by affordability

There were also some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It is a real thing, limited to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Muslims. Electors in immigrant strongholds that went for Trump last year backed Zohran this year. But I wouldn’t say he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

One of the big stories of the night was the sky-high participation. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Participation was significantly higher than I had expected. I thought it could go over two million, but it reached 2.3 million – that is a lot of darn voters. Existed a decent opposition group, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s likely to get over half. He has just over 50% but there’s still around 200,000 votes uncounted as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not certain, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he achieves it so then none can claim Sliwa was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Not even Tottenville in the borough, similar to an highly conservative neighborhood. That really was unexpected. Cuomo held very white areas, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many conservatives on the island with a high participation. I believe there was a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened before Trump tweeted his support for Cuomo, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome unless Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for Mamdani overwhelming in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view existed some weakening of the commie corridor in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. There, instance, the property owners and residents all went for the independent. Thus there was a little resistance. However overall, largely the commie corridor is another huge reason why Zohran prevailed – he was polling between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

Prior to the election we reported on if Mamdani was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

Exist areas with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as specific locales – where he did well. However in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential there. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they favored the independent. And also, there are newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were pretty staunchly Cuomo. So it’s unclear if there were major surprises on this one, but Mamdani did hold left-leaning areas and including sections of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York means politically? Will the commie corridor become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key political leaders from the left hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see more of that – people will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I believe that every city in America could develop their own commie corridor. Cities are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – because youth reside there, tenancy is common and they are places where people are crushed by the disparities exist.